likesthecoat (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
likesthecoat) wrote2007-07-25 11:38 pm
likesthecoat) wrote2007-07-25 11:38 pm
Entry tags:
er. yes.
Your Score: Rather Experienced
You are 58% pure!
| Link: The 100 Point Sexual Purity Test written by ocicat on OkCupid, home of the The Dating Persona Test |
Near, this is your fault.
no subject
I suppose . . . it's just, cybersex is so idealized and perfect, and real sex isn't, and I just don't want to hope for more than is humanly possible.
Ah, I see. I had, just never on the receiving end. So. Yes.
no subject
Well, I've never done it with someone I hadn't been with in reality already, so maybe it's different for me, but I didn't find there to be that much difference. I mean... Your wants and preferences and such are the same, and... I don't know, maybe people would "do" things in cyber situations that they wouldn't in real life, but I never have (possibly only because I know I'm going to end up seeing that person again very shortly afterwards and would have to explain it all).
Yes, so the last time I took it, any of the female-specific questions were no for me, but it's different now. Although obviously I hadn't done things on the receiving end before, either. ...It was nice, though.
no subject
I've only done it with Lorne. I doubt I'll have trouble meeting his eyes when we do meet, though, no matter what we've done online.
Multiple orgasms are brilliant. I rather miss them.
no subject
That's a good thing, though. Anyway, all I meant was that if you're going to be seeing the person, it wouldn't do to imply you'd be willing to do things if you wouldn't really. That can only lead to one awkward conversation, I'm sure.
You're getting on in years, Ianto~ You should try that whole tantric area, though. I hear that helps...
no subject
Ah, I see. Yes, you're right. I wouldn't like promises made that won't be kept.
Oh, hush, you. I'm not that old.